Follett proposed that, “Authority
should go with knowledge ... whether it is up the line or down.” In other
words, if workers have the relevant knowledge, then workers, rather than
managers, should be in control of the work process itself, and managers should
behave as coaches and facilitators—not as monitors and supervisors. In making
this statement, Follett anticipated the current interest in self managed teams and
empowerment. She also recognized the importance of having managers in different
departments communicate directly with each other to speed decision making. She
advocated what she called “cross-functioning”: members of different departments
working together in cross-departmental teams to accomplish projects—an approach
that is increasingly utilized today. Fayol also mentioned expertise and
knowledge as important sources of managers’ authority, but Follett went
further. She proposed that knowledge and expertise, and not managers’ formal
authority deriving from their position in the
Hierarchy
should decide who would lead at any particular moment. She believed, as do many
management theorists today, that power is fluid and should flow to the person
who can best help the organization achieve its goals. Follett took a horizontal
view of power and authority, in contrast to Fayol, who saw the formal line of
authority and vertical chain of command as being most essential to effective management.
Follett’s behavioural approach to management was very radical for its time.
First Lady of Management (Mary
Parker Follett)
Mr. F W Taylor is known as
father of Management Thought, but when it comes about Mother of Management?
The name of Mary Parker
Follett is always taken with respect in the field of management as Mother of
Scientific Management the credit of being first lady of management is also credited
in the account of Mary Follett. She was first lady ever invited from management
field to London School of Economics.
0 Comments